Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 61 - 80
of 21,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2021, 12:39 am
To be a pattern mark: EUIPO v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:27 am
SC07-1603 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
The magistrate judge recommended denying defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failure to state a claim. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
The IPKat has been informed that a third case is still proceeding at first instance.The Mark 1 decision was about dosage regimes and a composition with specified antibody purity, and the Mark 2 decision about formulations (including the fascinating issue of the construction of product-by-process claims).Now, hot of the press, the IPKat has got his paws on the appeal decision Hospira (UK) Ltd v Genentech, Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 57 (06 February 2015), posted on BAILII as… [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
This in particular since “the public retains only an imperfect memory of the marks registered in the Member States or of Community marks ... [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
[www.markschwab.us][www.markschwab.us]ny-821133 No. 08-13435-P _____________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _____________________________ MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm
’ State Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:16 am
As readers have no doubt not forgotten, an eight Justice Court is weighing the case of United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:50 pm
Coach Carroll has put Sanchez off limits to the press, stating, “I know how excited he is. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v Booking.com BV, the court upheld a Fourth Circuit decision stating that simply adding a top-level domain to a generic term does not render the mark generic in its entirety. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
This filing is in response to the SEC’s Law in Opposition to Mark Cuban’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:27 am
ITC Limited v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 11:30 am
Popofsky & Anthony Biagioli (Ropes & Gray) address The Sherman Act's Extra-Territorial Reach: Unresolved Questions Raised by United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
” Chiarella v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:25 pm
In State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:26 am
" ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:20 am
It was not controlled by state law. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:22 am
" United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
