Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 21 - 40 of 21,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm by Carissa Byrne Hessick
Many law professors were watching Hughes because it promised to revisit the rule from Marks v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:26 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
"In light of the not uncommon practice of lawyers to argue inconsistent theories, we cannot say that the decision of Dekoria Marks's trial lawyer to argue them here deprived her of the right to constitutionally effective assistance, irrespective of whether we or the [...] [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:35 am by Richard M. Re
Earlier this month, the Court granted review of Hughes v.... [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:46 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Waiver of jury trial — On-the-record examination Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Somerset County, Mark Russell, appellant, was convicted of sexual solicitation of a minor. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 6:55 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Conspiracy to distribute heroin Mark Garner, appellant, was charged, in the Circuit Court for St. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:01 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Prior bad acts M.H. consulted in late 2013 with Mark Andrew Matthews (Appellant), a tattoo artist at Damascus Tattoo Company. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 7:02 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Illegal sentence — Merger of robbery convictions In 2014, Mark Kenneth Floyd, appellant, was sentenced by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to two 10-year terms of imprisonment, run consecutively, for two counts of robbery. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:44 pm by Daily Record Staff
After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City from July 14-16, 2011, Mark Kenneth Floyd, appellant, was convicted of the robberies of Royster and Steed. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:19 am by The Docket Navigator
Plaintiff's complaint alleging expired patents as the basis for a false marking claim did not fail to state a claim under 35 USC § 292. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:18 pm by Howard Bashman
United States and the Effects of the Marks Rule”: Richard M. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0461, 2009 MT 452, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 2:34 pm by Minick Law
Answer: Yes, according to the recent Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]