Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 81 - 100 of 21,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2022, 11:10 am by Guest Author
Download this Insight (PDF) Access the code and data (GitHub repository) Introduction The majority decision in Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am by Nedim Malovic
The position of the EUIPO, when it comes to acquired distinctiveness through use in the UK for the purposes of an invalidation action against a registered EU trade mark (EUTM), is that the distinctiveness acquired through use in the UK is not relevant for EU trade mark applications filed after the end of the transition period (December 31st, 2020).However, the now said has not always been entirely clear, since case law (Decathlon v EUIPO (T‑349/19) EU:T:2020:488),… [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am by war
Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130 Société Anonyme des Manujactures de Glaces v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:23 am by scanner1
STATE OF MONTANA, Defendant, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:22 pm by Afro Leo
(Afro Leo says check here for background.)The topic of his lecture was “Deprivation of Trade Marks through State Interference”. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 7:48 am by The Docket Navigator
Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking case for failure to state a claim was granted. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:15 am by IPWatchdog
’s (Weigel) registration of the mark W WEIGEL’S KITCHEN NOW OPEN on the ground that there was not likelihood of confusion with QuikTrip’s registered design mark, QT KITCHENS (QuikTrip West, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:15 am by SLT
Spognardi Chicago Partner Mark Spognardi is the planning chair for tomorrow’s ALI-ABA teleseminar Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 12:41 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court heard oral argument in McDonnell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:56 am by Immigration Prof
Mark Joseph Stern for Slate recaps the oral arguments in the Supreme Court yesterday in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:18 pm
Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/95 (the Trade Mark Directive) states that: “The trade mark shall not entitle the proprietor to prohibit a third party from using, in the course of trade: (a) his own name or address provided he uses them in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters. [read post]