Search for: "State v. Martinez" Results 141 - 160 of 1,770
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2021, 3:45 am by SHG
A 2012 Supreme Court case, Martinez v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
The standard of proof is not stringent, amounting only to some firsthand confirmation of the facts" (Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531, 535 [1st Dept 1987]; see Martinez v Reiner, 104 AD3d 477, 478 [1st Dept 2013]; Beltre v Babu, 32 AD3d 722, 723 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am by Richard Hunt
¹ Websites as public accommodations in the Second Circuit In Martinez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
Arteaga-Martinez (Jan. 11): Whether a non-citizen who is detained under 8 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The Noerr-Pennington doctrine protects the right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to petition the government for governmental action, including through litigation and activity incidental to litigation” (Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d 67, 77 [citation omitted]; see Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268 AD2d 101, 106-107). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Colorado Martinez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Colorado Martinez v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 12:51 pm by Rohini Kurup
In June, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, affirming the lower court ruling in each action, said that "When a party moves to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the standard is whether the pleading states a cause of action, not whether the proponent of the pleading has a cause of action," citing Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, affirming the lower court ruling in each action, said that "When a party moves to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the standard is whether the pleading states a cause of action, not whether the proponent of the pleading has a cause of action," citing Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180. [read post]