Search for: "State v. Mata"
Results 1 - 20
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
In the case of Mata v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:39 am
Oct. 11, 2022); and United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:03 am
The Court specifically referenced the case of Mata v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
In Mata v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am
” Citing the original and now famous hallucinated citations case Mata v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
”* See Mata v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
”* See Mata v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
" Mata v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:18 am
In a highly publicized and widely discussed case, Mata v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
On November 16, 2023, the Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct (COPRAC) of the State Bar of California developed and adopted as Practical Guidance a set of duties that carefully reconciled existing laws with directives on how lawyers should act when using generative AI tools. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Mata v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 1:24 pm
Not only is Generative AI using a wealth of information, it is also capable of producing original “thought;” as was the case in the Mata v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
As a follow-up to last year’s blog on United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
See, e.g., Mata v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm
Flora et al. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
There is one case that was widely publicized all over the world In Mata v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:54 am
Because we have no information regarding why the briefing is illogical, and because we have addressed the issue raised on appeal, we resist the temptation to issue a show cause order as a New York federal district judge did in Mata v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:17 pm
We’ve missed a few things while I was gone:The judge in the Mata v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:43 pm
Cite: Mata v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 4:44 am
Federal Court Sanctions Lawyers for ChatGPT UseRoberto Mata, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
