Search for: "State v. Mauro" Results 61 - 80 of 774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Rachel Sachs
At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner profiles Edith Windsor, the plaintiff in this Term’s United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:22 am by Steve Hall
As noted above, the responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:05 am by Andrew Hamm
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse argues that, if the Justices “approach their task as judges and not as politicians, the administration will easily prevail” in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Francis writes:   "To recover on a claim for an account stated under New York law, the plaintiff must show that: "'(1) an account was presented; (2) it was accepted as correct; and (3) [the] debtor promised to pay the amount stated.'" Camacho Mauro Mulholland LLP v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 1:45 pm
Finally, Don Thompson of the AP reports here that the California senate approved a bill that would change the state's sentencing scheme in the wake of the Court's ruling in Cunningham v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
United States ex. rel. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 2:02 pm
Tony Mauro has this new Legal Times article about today's SCOTUS oral argument in Scott v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am by Andrew Hamm
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am by Edith Roberts
In Cato at Liberty, Trevor Burrus and David McDonald argue that the Court should grant review in Foster v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am by Erin Miller
Tony Mauro at the National Law Journal (free registration required) reports this morning that James Feldman, a former Assistant to the Solicitor General who has argued forty-five times before the Supreme Court, will defend Chicago’s strict handgun ban in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center, Lisa Soronen looks back at last month’s argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports that “Deputy U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:45 am by Marissa Miller
City of Chicago and District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]