Search for: "State v. Mazur"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2010, 6:44 pm
In Mazur v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:25 am
Diagnostics v Eagle Ins. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:28 am
Here is Professor Goldman's post on the case: "eBay Denied 230 Defense for Its Marketing Representations--Mazur v. eBay. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:51 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Englert v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:44 am
United States, a constitutional challenge to "Don't Ask, Don't Tell. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:57 am
The High Court also rejected Novo Banco’s contention that the court should decline jurisdiction by reason of the doctrine of “non-justiciability” or “act of state”, and refused to stay the proceedings as it was not satisfied that there were any “rare and compelling” circumstances and the scope of exercising such power was “extremely limited” as set out in Mazur Media Ltd v Mazur Media GmbH [2004] EWHC 1566… [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:53 am
By Eric Goldman Doe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
For example, 4 NYCRR 4.5(f),***a Rule adopted by the New York State Civil Service Commission pursuant to the authority set out in Civil Service Law §63.2, provides that with respect to employees of the State as an employer, “the minimum and maximum periods of the probationary term of any employee shall be extended by the number of workdays of his [or her] absence which ... are not counted as time served in the probationary term. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
For example, 4 NYCRR 4.5(f),***a Rule adopted by the New York State Civil Service Commission pursuant to the authority set out in Civil Service Law §63.2, provides that with respect to employees of the State as an employer, “the minimum and maximum periods of the probationary term of any employee shall be extended by the number of workdays of his [or her] absence which ... are not counted as time served in the probationary term. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
In today’s case (Cambie Surgeries Corporation v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 pm
(See our discussion of this in Mazur v. eBay; see also the FTC's 2010 enforcement action against Twitter.) [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 12:35 pm
July 16, 2018) (purported collective and class action brought under federal and state wage and hour laws by truck drivers who hauled raw materials and asphalt alleging they were not paid overtime compensation, hours worked were not reported on weekly pay statements, and they were denied a certain percentage of revenue the defendants earned from hauling raw material) Mazur, et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:00 am
The court distinguishes Lemmon v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Mazur U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 11:35 am
* State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Burnett in its December 11, 2014 decision in Matter of Noella Lum B. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:30 am
Extending the probationary periodSubway-Surface Supervisors Assn. v New York City Tr. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:57 pm
By Eric Goldman Levitt v. [read post]
