Search for: "State v. McCormick" Results 161 - 180 of 383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 4:25 am
Evidence obtained using a global positioning device [GPS] permitted in administrative disciplinary hearingMatter of Matter of Cunningham v New York State Dept. of Labor, 2011 NY Slip Op 08529, Appellate Division, Third Department Michael A. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The 7th amendment, believe it or not, does not apply in state courts. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 11:31 am by Shafik Bhalloo
The Tribunal ruled against Fasken stating that it had jurisdiction over the complaint on the ground that the firm, for the purpose of the Code, employed McCormick. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 11:31 am by Shafik Bhalloo
The Tribunal ruled against Fasken stating that it had jurisdiction over the complaint on the ground that the firm, for the purpose of the Code, employed McCormick. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
” The relevance of 19th-century cases on patents, such as McCormick v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although the complaint alleges that Devine and Neiman induced Allen to lend money beginning in 2000, the continuing wrong doctrine (see Selkirk v State of New York, 249 AD2d 818, 819; Barash v Estate of Sperlin, 271 AD2d 558) applies such that the six-year statute of limitations “began to run from the commission of the last wrongful act” (Community Network Serv., Inc. v Verizon NY, Inc., 39 AD3d 300, 301). [read post]