Search for: "State v. McCully" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
English courts have stated more clearly that Art 8 does not protect corporate reputation (Euromoney Institutional Investor Plc v Aviation News Ltd at [20]), and also seem suspicious of the idea that it is protected by A1P1 (Ajinomoto Sweeteners V Asda Stores Ltd at [29]). [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am by INFORRM
 We have had over 400,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, Australia, Malaysia and India making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am by INFORRM
” Jonathan McCully is the Senior Legal Officer of the Media Legal Defence Initiative and Editor at Columbia Global Freedom of Expression. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:56 am by INFORRM
No positive obligation on States: the Court had found that Article 10 did not confer on a State positive obligations to collect and disseminate information of its own motion (Guerra and Others v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:19 am by Nani Jansen Reventlow
No positive obligation on States: the Court had found that Article 10 did not confer on a State positive obligations to collect and disseminate information of its own motion (Guerra and Others v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In reaching this conclusion, the Supreme Court quoted the case of Secretary Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Government of India v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On 5 December 2014, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the “Court”) delivered its ground breaking judgment on freedom of expression in Lohé Issa Konaté v Burkina Faso (Application No 004/2013 [pdf] (available only in French). [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Tessa Jowell complained to the PCC about an article in the Daily Mail which stated that Jowell had been criticised by the Cabinet Secretary in 2006 over an alleged payment to her husband by Silvio Berlusconi. [read post]