Search for: "State v. McDaniel"
Results 221 - 240
of 256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Davis v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:59 am
Moreover, the 1963-90 Free Exercise Clause rules that the RFRAs were meant to restore included protections for elected officials, see McDaniel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm
As Justice Brennan wrote in McDaniel v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:37 am
In Prince of Peace Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
The court found that Michael's opinion was contradicted by decedent's medical records and the testimony of her physician, who stated that decedent was in full control of her faculties during an examination on the day that she executed the 2015 Will. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:49 am
In Haiss v Ball, the offers to settle were Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), Part 36 offers. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
See McDaniel v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:17 am
See McDaniel v. [read post]
14 Dec 2004, 5:06 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
Arnold Kling ponders the Hoover presidency: Price V. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Mukasey, No. 05-4448 Petition for review of a decision denying petitioner asylum and related relief, and finding that he was removable due to a prior state conviction for possession of a controlled substance, is denied where a remand was unnecessary because petitioner's challenge to the state court conviction constituted an impermissible collateral attack, and he presented no other claims that would entitle him to relief. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
See also Georgia State Bar Rules, DR 7-102(A)(3), (4) and (5); DR 7-106(C) (1); Rule 4-102(d) Standard 45 and O.C.G.A. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Shoemaker, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Sanctuary Law and a Strong Anglo-Saxon State? [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:09 am
The Court of Appeals holds in a class-action settlement case that the district court can award attorneys' fees based on the traditional lodestar method rather than the common-fund model.The case is McDaniel v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
In the Swofford v. [read post]
