Search for: "State v. McGill" Results 1 - 20 of 249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Susannah Tredwell
Section 1.6 states that “when citing to online resources, provide the full traditional citation, followed by a comma. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:00 am by Ted Tjaden
Rule 2.1.10 of the McGill Guide states: Abbreviate section to s and sections to ss in the footnotes [i.e., with no period], but always write the full word in the text. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 1:13 am by
While Roberts was on appeal, the California Supreme Court handed down its decision in McGill v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 8:48 am
On January 16, 2008, the Court decided the case of New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:18 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Recorded calls Appellant, Carl Cooper, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of attempted first degree murder of an unknown person, first degree assault of Martha Gilliard, first degree assault of Hogan McGill, three counts of use of a firearm in the ... [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:51 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
Briefing is now complete on the petitions for certiorari in the Blair v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 11:15 am by Mark J. Levin
They contend that the McGill Rule is preempted because the FAA protects the right of parties to choose individualized resolution of their claims, notwithstanding contrary state law, and because the McGill Rule is not a ground “at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract” (the FAA’s savings clause), but instead impermissibly singles out arbitration for special treatment. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:46 am by Conor McEvily
petition of the day is: Title: McGill v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:00 am by JOHN VASSILLOU, MCGILL & CO
McGill & Co have been in the Supreme Court acting for the Respondent to the Government’s appeal in the case of The Advocate General for Scotland v Romein. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:28 am
LEXIS 86609 (S.D.N.Y., Dec. 1, 2006) United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Mugesera v. [read post]
Notably, the majority in Hodges recognized that its definition of public injunctive relief is narrower than that adopted by California state appellate courts in Mejia v. [read post]