Search for: "State v. McKinney"
Results 201 - 220
of 429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2015, 2:07 pm
With the August 26, 2015 Supreme Court opinion in McKinney v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
It states:`12. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm
Committee Report on Court Reorganization [1962], Family Ct.Act, p. 2, McKinney Session Laws, 1962, p. 3430). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
West Virginia State School Board of Education v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
” At the Knowledge Center of the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen discusses the Court’s recent grant in another redistricting case, Shapiro v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
Some distinguish private university libraries by stating that there is no public right to use them. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Justice Scalia in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Justice Scalia in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Page 567 658 N.Y.S.2d 567 172 Misc.2d 186 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Page 567 658 N.Y.S.2d 567 172 Misc.2d 186 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 2:13 pm
" (Governor's Mem, 1980 McKinney's Session Laws of NY, at 1877-1878.) [read post]
25 May 2015, 2:13 pm
" (Governor's Mem, 1980 McKinney's Session Laws of NY, at 1877-1878.) [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:54 am
Quintana, 237 A.D.2d 130, 654 N.Y.S.2d 27; Merola v Merola, supra; Kilmer v Kilmer, supra; Leffingwell v Leffingwell, supra ). [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:54 am
Quintana, 237 A.D.2d 130, 654 N.Y.S.2d 27; Merola v Merola, supra; Kilmer v Kilmer, supra; Leffingwell v Leffingwell, supra ). [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm
The bill as it now stands, demonstrates a legislative intent to construe that provision as retroactive.' (McKinney's Session Laws 1968, ch. 700, p. 2308; see LeClaire v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
Had that been the case, the New York State and United States legislatures would have added language providing for such exceptions. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:38 pm
(See, Chieco v. [read post]
