Search for: "State v. McKinney"
Results 221 - 240
of 429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2015, 1:53 pm
(See People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
The test is one of "usefulness and reason"(Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 6:45 pm
Matter of Julian B. v Williams, 97 AD3d 670). [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
" (Donnino, Practice Commentary, McKinney's Cons Law of NY, Penal Law § 400.00).6 Thus, any person to whom a license has been issued may lawfully possess a firearm in his or her home. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:20 am
V-15116-08. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:31 pm
– Milwaukee lawyer Bernand Bobber of Foley & Lardner on the firm’s blog, Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Net Neutrality V.3: What We Know So Far – Arlington, VA lawyer Paul Feldman of Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth on the firm’s CommLawBlog NYU Grad Students On Verge Of Labor Strike – Atlanta attorney Cary Burke of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Labor Relations Today Bidders: Pay Attention to Your Clocks, Fax Machines and… [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:18 pm
McKinney School of Law) has posted United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:19 am
However, the Supreme Court incorrectly determined that the subsequent contributions by Man Choi Chiu should be treated as capital contributions, and not as loans, as the record was bereft of any evidence of an agreement between the members to such treatment (see Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d 917, 920; Matter of KSI Rockville v Eichengrun, 305 AD2d 681; Rich, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 32A, 2014 Cumulative Pocket Part, at 72). [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
Balikama v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
In Valli Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 2:02 pm
The state was challenging the Ninth's decision to stay the mandate in Henry's case while it considers another case, McKinney v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 5:32 am
New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Dev. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am
CPLR §§ 7803(3)-(4) (McKinney 2014). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am
CPLR §§ 7803(3)-(4) (McKinney 2014). [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:24 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:24 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
He writes (McKinney's Cons. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
Poyson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm
That on or about ___________________, in the county of ______, State of New York, the defendant, _______________, used or permitted the utilization of an imaging device to record a person dressing or undressing, or the sexual or other intimate parts of a person at a place and time when such person had a reasonable expectation of privacy, 2. [read post]
