Search for: "State v. McKinney"
Results 261 - 280
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 5:54 am
Though perhaps illogical, the verdicts may stand ( see, United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:57 am
Plaintiffs received a promissory note stating that the $100,000 would be applied to the purchase price upon closing. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 3:51 pm
McKinney Hosp. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 3:51 pm
McKinney Hosp. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
Connors, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3025:3 at 87, citing Mendoza v Mendoza, 4 Misc 2d 1060, 1061 [Sup Ct, NY County 1947], affd 273 App Div 877 [1st Dept 1948]). [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:41 am
A claim for simple negligence is “restricted to those cases where the alleged negligent act is readily determinable by the trier of the facts on common knowledge,” whereas a claim for malpractice is one that typically requires expert testimony or other specialized knowledge (Hale v State of New York, 53 AD2d 1025, 1025 [4th Dept 1976]). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 10:59 am
The Iowa Court of Appeals addressed Oppression, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Freeze Out, and Judicial Dissolution in Jochimsen v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 8:12 am
McKinney v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
McKinney School of Law. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
McKinney School of Law. [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:54 am
Quintana, 237 A.D.2d 130, 654 N.Y.S.2d 27; Merola v Merola, supra; Kilmer v Kilmer, supra; Leffingwell v Leffingwell, supra ). [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 8:10 am
McKinney, 545 So. 2d 1216, 1220 (La. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 8:10 am
McKinney, 545 So. 2d 1216, 1220 (La. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
§285), and numerous states have taken action against NPE's as well. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
– Legal marketing expert Paula Black on her In Black and White blog FunnyJunk v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Law § 624 (McKinney). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:38 pm
(See, Chieco v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:49 pm
United States will be Stanley G. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
The test is one of "usefulness and reason"(Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:08 am
Later that day, he spoke to Leschins, "who confirmed that he had consulted with plaintiff weeks earlier," but "refused to state whether he would be appearing as attorney for plaintiff" in the lawsuit. [read post]
