Search for: "State v. McMahon"
Results 1 - 20
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:50 pm
In the case of McMahon v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:50 pm
In the case of McMahon v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:13 am
McMahon, decided on July 20. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
"Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) provides that an agency may deny access to records that are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute" (see Matter of Crowe v Guccione, supra); and3. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
"Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) provides that an agency may deny access to records that are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute" (see Matter of Crowe v Guccione, supra); and3. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 11:17 am
McMahon, 482 U.S. 220 (1987). [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
On the same day, Linden J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the libel case of Evans v McMahon and Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Samuels v Laycock. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
On 17 April 2023, the Washington State House concurred to the State Senate’s amendments to Washington State House Bill 1155, the My Health My Data Act. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
State equality in the Senate constrains persons who believe in representation by population, configures politics by enabling low population states to receive far more than their fair share of federal funds, and constitutes politics when people assume that equal state representation is a natural feature of governance in the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:32 am
Code §115 (Lee v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 1:02 pm
Yesterday's Louisiana Court of Appeal decision in State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:32 pm
McMahon, 483 U.S. 1056 (1987). [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 6:30 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, although "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure," in this instance an affirmation of the Village Attorney demonstrating a valid basis for the denial of the Freedom of Information [FOIL] request at issue by establishing that the records sought therein were exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i) and thus… [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 6:30 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, although "[a]ll government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure," in this instance an affirmation of the Village Attorney demonstrating a valid basis for the denial of the Freedom of Information [FOIL] request at issue by establishing that the records sought therein were exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i) and thus… [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:40 am
Mujo v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Garnett & Mitchell Koppinger, Tandon v. [read post]
