Search for: "State v. McNeil"
Results 1 - 20
of 353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2024, 12:03 pm
This is a major ruling validating the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising, which occurs when an advertiser purchases and displays ads triggered in response to third-party trademarks. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 1:55 am
Events Gemma McNeil-Walsh (5RB) will be delivering the next webinar to the Next Generation Media Lawyers members on 10 October 2024 from 1pm to 2pm. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:05 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Schweber and Anderson explain that under the test established in Brandenburg v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
–Adler v McNeil * Court Denies Injunction in Competitive Keyword Ad Lawsuit–Nursing CE Central v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 3:12 am
Dustin Jansen, The Role of United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Historians appear prominently in the Supreme Court's decision in Haaland v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
McNeil * Three Keyword Advertising Decisions in a Week, and the Trademark Owners Lost Them All * Competitor Gets Pyrrhic Victory in False Advertising Suit Over Search Ads–Harbor Breeze v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
The defendant is the Bye, Goff firm, based in River Falls, Wisconsin with other in-state offices. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:06 am
The post RUDOLPH MCNEIL v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:08 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 11:11 am
McNeil v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:12 pm
” McNeil v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:45 am
McNeil-PPC, Inc., 786 F. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 6:53 am
For example, in the McNeil v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:32 pm
Supreme Court case, Shearson/American Express v. [read post]
