Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 41 - 60
of 68,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2009, 2:07 am
Regina (QY) (China) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Even if the assumption was made that removing a foreign national who had forfeited the right to remain could amount to an interference with private life within the meaning of article 8.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, her removal was nevertheless [...] [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
In agreeing to hear Moore v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:09 am
In Nagribianko v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 7:22 am
State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm
United States Steel Corporation. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm
United States Steel Corporation. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:56 am
Former ADO Jocilyn Oyler won in State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:39 pm
The United States Supreme Court today heard oral argument in Sandifer v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:22 am
United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:22 am
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:09 pm
A few days ago the Division One Court of Appeals in WA State recently came down with a ruling that was not favorable to defendants facing a DUI charge in WA. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 2:01 am
Harper does and doesn't mean for the security of U.S. elections moving forward. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 1:13 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 1:13 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:16 am
Adedoyin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 773; [2010] WLR (D) 172 “Dishonesty or deception was required to render a false representation a ground for mandatory refusal of an application for extension of leave to remain. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:14 am
R (Tilianu) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 1397; [2010] WLR (D) 320 ” ‘Employment’ within the meaning of art 7(3)(b) and (c) of Directive 2004/38/EC did not include self-employment, with the result that an EU citizen who was no longer self-employed did not retain the status of worker and had no right to reside. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:12 am
As I understood State Farm's appellate brief in Tuepker v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:14 pm
Our Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]