Search for: "State v. Medicine Bull"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
Lunch SESSION V: IDENTIFYING GAPS IN THE EVIDENTIARY BASESession Objectives:• Highlight evidentiary gaps that, if filled, would help inform potential approaches for health care providers. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 8:09 pm
Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. -- Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:56 pm
Kamakahi v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:56 pm
Kamakahi v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
Fraudulent antiquities are sold in the same way that knockoff jeans, counterfeit medicines, and fraudulent sports merchandise are peddled to consumers. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 1:01 am
The bull also subjected Jews to various other restrictions such as a prohibition on property ownership and practicing medicine among Christians. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
It states that that the Elanco-branded "Panoramis" pet medicines are materially different from its Elanco-branded "Trifexis" pet medicines sold in the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 6:28 pm
Bull et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:07 pm
In this post, we look at how different medical bodies, specifically those in Europe (the European Medicines Agency (EMA) ) and in the United States (the FDA) look at evidence that might be considered "clear and convincing. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:23 am
It states that that the Elanco-branded "Panoramis" pet medicines are materially different from its Elanco-branded "Trifexis" pet medicines sold in the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:03 am
§ 271(e)(4)(B), Defendants be permanently enjoined from making, using, selling or offering to sell any of the Defendants' accused products within the United States, or, where applicable, importing accused products into the United States prior to the expiration of the '703 and '325 patents;• That, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
§ 271(e)(4)(B), Panacea be permanently enjoined from making, using, selling or offering to sell any of its accused products within the United States, or, where applicable, importing accused products into the United States prior to the expiration of the '703 and '325 patents;• That, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 May 2013, 12:33 pm
(click here for a copy of the ruling Mondolo v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:30 am
Accounted for $142 billion in foreign sales and exports, far more than sectors such as aerospace, agriculture, food, and pharmaceuticals and medicines. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 8:54 am
ImPACT Applications, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 11:21 pm
The FDA has issued a few guidelines for consumers to look out for while purchasing medicines and medical devices online: • Always purchase from pharmacies located in the US • Purchase only from pharmacies that require you to produce a doctor's prescription before allowing you to buy from them • The online pharmacy should have a valid license from the board of pharmacy of its respective state [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:47 pm
" Uccello v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:22 am
This is not to suggest that the State Council, as the delegated institutional organ charged by the vanguard with the task of relating the task of overcoming the current principal contradiction in its "human rights" aspects, were not looking over their shoulder at how the rest of the world would read and interpret the document. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
| "BOSWELAN" - No Special Treatment for Medicinal Product Trade Marks | CJEU dismisses Red Bull’s appeal concerning its colour combination marks | The trademark question that never stops giving: when is there a material difference between the registered form and the form of actual use? [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:49 am
This is worth noting as it seems to flow from the Supreme Court's ruling in Chaoulli v. [read post]
