Search for: "State v. Melson"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2008, 6:12 am
CAAF's decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:28 am
The case, LePage v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:18 pm
At this Friday's conference, the Supreme Court is scheduled to consider a petition for rehearing in Melson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:17 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:11 am
Department of Justice (No. 1:11-cv-01796)), (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
UPDATES as of 2:35 p.m.: In a highly unusual order, the Court asked state officials in Alabama to respond to a rehearing request in a pauper's criminal case - Melson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:57 am
In a highly unusual order, the Court asked state officials in Alabama to respond to a rehearing request in a pauper’s criminal case â€" Melson v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
Yesterday CAAF docketed two certified issues in an Air Force case:WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLIED THE CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE MOTION FOR A SANITY BOARD.WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR A SANITY BOARD FINDING HE HAD NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF FACTUAL PERSUASION TO JUSTIFY… [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:59 pm
” [via LexisOne] Robert Bryant Melson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:14 am
Also at PrawfsBlawg, Aaron Bruhl discusses the relatively rare request for a response in a petition for rehearing, Melson v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:46 pm
" United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:54 am
Last week we learned that Judge Berchelmann doesn't think there should be any sanction imposed on Sharon Keller.Yesterday, we saw that the Supreme Court declined its own invitation to overrule (or at least weaken) Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Buie, No. 070258 Sentence of fifteen years for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed where: 1) because the maximum penalty for the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty was ten years or more under state statute, defendant's state felony narcotics conviction qualified as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA); and 2) defendant's allegation that he was deprived of counsel at his plea hearing did not state a… [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
Which is why the recent case of Empire Developers Group v. [read post]
