Search for: "State v. Menard" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
On July 21, 2010 the Supreme Court of Wisconsin decided Sands v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:24 am
Evidence of pretext bars summary judgment of a Title VII complaint alleging unlawful discrimination because of race Curry v Menard, Inc., CA7, 00-4219, 270 F.3d. 473 Demonstrating that other employees of a different race were not subjected to the same disciplinary action for the same offense is sufficient to establish “pretext” for the purposes of Title VII. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mountain States Petroleum Corporation and Nacogdoches Oil and Gas, Inc., No. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 2:34 pm by Sean Wajert
Menard, Inc., 105 F.3d 382, 386 (7th Cir.1997). [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Galveston City Company, 111 U.S. 170 (1884), the United States Supreme Court observed that the limitations defense of an agent would also protect those on whose behalf the agent acted as agent. 111 U.S. at 174 ("But manifestly the statute of limitations that barred the claims against Menard . . . would equally protect those on whose behalf Menard acted as agent"). [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
In July 2020, in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In Brannan, the court cited Mudano for the proposition "that a plaintiff's case will fail when the testimony of his two expert witnesses is so contradictory that the jury is left with no guidance on the issue, see also Menarde v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  In this medical malpractice action, Judge Nealon concluded that two event reports generated by the hospital involved as a result of two surgeries performed at the hospital were not protected from discovery under state and federal laws governing peer reviews and patient safety reporting.At No. 12 on the Top 25 list was Judge Minora's Opinion in the case of Menard v. [read post]