Search for: "State v. Midkiff"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 6:42 am
This Article argues that the generally accepted understanding of Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
This Article argues that the generally accepted understanding of Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
Midkiff, 463 U.S. 1323 (1984) - "Public use" is "coterminous" with the police power. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:24 am
This Article argues that the generally accepted understanding of Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:20 pm
Auth. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
Fink then crossed over the center line of Route V and struck Midkiff's vehicle head-on. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:34 am
The case is Midkiff v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm
” But as Ben Barros has shown, it was actually deliberately inserted in the Midkiff opinion (O’Connor refused to take it out even after Justice Lewis Powell warned her that it would license virtually unconstrained takings).That said, Stevens is wrong to suggest that the Court’s only options were either to overrule Midkiff and Berman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
Midkiff). [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
Midkiff). [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:01 am
United States, No. 08-497 (cert. petition filed Oct. 15, 2008). [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:02 am
The Solicitor General has filed the United States' Brief in Opposition in AmeriSource Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:40 pm
City and County of Honolulu, 124 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1995)) and state (Richardson v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 10:46 pm
City and County of Honolulu, 124 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1997)) and state courts (Richardson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 12:18 am
United States, No. 04-41196 (5th Cir. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
Kelo was an important decision that drew a massive political backlash (over 80% of the public opposed the ruling, and 45 states enacted eminent domain reform laws in reaction to it) and remains contentious to this day. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 2:53 pm
Midkiff (1984) 467 U.S. 229. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am
Midkiff (1984), where she states that the public use requirement can be met so long as the government's objective in condemning property is "rationally related to a conceivable public purpose. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:17 pm
Auth. v. [read post]
