Search for: "State v. Mikell" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 5:42 pm by Joseph Stacey
Pandemic safety measures intended for the fishing industry differ from state to state. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am by Public Employment Law Press
This failure to observe statutory procedure was sufficiently prejudicial, under the circumstances of this matter, to require vacatur of the arbitration award (see Marracino v Alexander, 73 AD3d at 26; Sartiano v Becker, 119 AD2d 656, 656; Matter of Mikel v Scharf, 85 AD2d at 604). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:30 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
Mikel, 625 F.3d 772 (2d Circuit, 2010) - Reversing summary judgment on issue of serious injury in a motor vehicle accident case. [read post]