Search for: "State v. Miller" Results 181 - 200 of 4,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 4:32 am
Anyway, bizarro Ron Miller strikes back in Southern Maryland Online: I was pleasantly surprised to stumble across a response to my column on medical malpractice liability reform from another Ron Miller, Ronald V. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm by Kent Scheidegger
John Elwood's relist watch notes two cases of 14-year-olds sentenced to life without parole for murder:  Miller v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm by Bill Otis
The Federalist Society asked me to write one paragraph for press distribution about today's decision in Miller v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm by Aurora Barnes
Idaho 17-236 Issues: (1) Whether the Eighth Amendment categorically prohibits life-without-parole sentences for juvenile offenders; and (2) whether, when the evidence demonstrates that the plaintiff lacks a prior history of violence and has high potential for rehabilitation, the state’s pre-Miller v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58:  The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm by Quinta Jurecic
As to Miller’s position that Congress has not authorized Mueller’s work by statute, the court simply pointed to United States v. [read post]