Search for: "State v. Millett"
Results 21 - 40
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
Maynard suggested an alternative basis for the Michigan law, one that Judge Patricia Millett of the U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 10:10 pm
The primary example cited in the story is the punitive damages decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:53 am
Adam Liptak wrote about my favorite exchange of the day: The question for the justices was whether that state law conflicted with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allows voters to register using a federal form that asks, “Are you a citizen of the United States? [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:34 am
On state post-conviction review, the Tennessee courts refused to consider petitioner's claim under Brady v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
Patricia Millett will argue United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
At 11 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:55 pm
v=w8ydBekmEOw [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:25 am
We affirm the judgment of the trial court. ") AC34059 - Millette v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 1:58 pm
See Whitman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:47 am
It focuses on the doctrine we call the political status doctrine, first articulated by the Supreme Court in Morton v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 6:59 am
Circuit's ruling in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 5:13 pm
The panel (Circuit Judges Srinivasan, Millett & Sentelle) concluded that the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction under the terms of the applicable treaty between the United States and Colombia, although none of the defendants had been aboard the ill-fated boat. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
The Prosecutor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Millett will argue on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of California. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument in Samantar v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:50 am
S. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:44 am
The Charleston Law Review, the flagship journal of the Charleston School of Law, invites submissions for its General Issue of Volume V ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER an author chooses. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:32 am
While Lord Millett in Bolkiah had explicitly stated that the assessment should not be a balancing exercise, this depended on there being a fiduciary duty owed by a solicitor to a former client to prioritise his interests. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
Facts: This case (Crane Co. v. [read post]
