Search for: "State v. Miner"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2012, 3:09 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0272, 2012 MT 20, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:46 am
Consider Bauer and Braxton Minerals II v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:14 am
Davis, Individually and d/b/a JD Minerals, and JDMI, LLC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:10 am
The Eighth Court of Appeals in El Paso has issued its opinion in State of Texas v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:52 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
Candidate 2015) recently published an article entitled, The intersection of Louisiana succession law and Mineral Code article 190: Quantum Resources v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:20 am
With less than two months before the May 31 deadline for public companies to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the inclusion of conflict minerals in their products, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a final judgment in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:03 pm
The legislative power to tax mineral rights vests with the State legislatures. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:14 am
In Hosek v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 4:46 am
So says Pearl Resources Operating Co., LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
The Louisiana Supreme Court’s reversal of Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 6:32 am
Co-author David Leonard In a precurser of disputes sure to come, in Lyle v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:35 am
Here are updated materials in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:31 am
Valls v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:27 am
Hinnigan In Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 7:09 am
It is an Eastland Court of Appeals case styled, Spurlock v Beacon Lloyds Insurance Company. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:19 am
The Dodd-Frank Act (Act) Section 1502 addressed these “conflict minerals” —tantalum, tin, tungsten and gold—by directing the SEC, the Department of State (State), the U.S. [read post]
