Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 181 - 200 of 1,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2016, 4:30 am by Charles Sartain
  Pel-State sent Shell a notice that the contractor was not paying for the sub’s work and then perfected a mineral lien. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm by John McFarland
After reviewing other authority, the Corpus Christi court concluded that, contrary to Mapco, “the well-recognized, decisional law states that the mineral estate owner owns the minerals but not the subsurface. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:34 am by Charles Sartain
United States was whether certain mineral related transactions between Exxon and the countries of Qatar and Malaysia were sales or leases. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:02 pm
Justice Souter filed a brief concurrence, printed here in its entirety: I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by Charles Sartain
Its principal place of business is Texas and was organized to acquire and own mineral interests in states other than Texas. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:58 am by Steve Statsinger
August 13, 2010) (Miner, Cabranes, Wesley, CJJ)Five months ago, in United States v. [read post]