Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 221 - 240 of 1,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2009, 4:25 pm
The controversy finally made its way to the Texas Supreme Court in 1928, in Greene v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:04 pm by Sasha Volokh
Can surface rights owners control the rights of those who own the mineral rights underneath? [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, 515 U.S. 557 (1995) or United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 1:37 pm by Steve Statsinger
Here are the two most recent PC’s.In United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
  They did not allow land to remain in its natural state, but over generations both developed it for a variety of commercial purposes and exploited it for mineral resources. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm by Kerry Shapiro
If SMARA is truly intended to promote the protection and development of mineral resources, it should correctly reflect how the markets for the State’s mineral resources actually behave. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:44 am by Charles Sartain
Impose reasonable regulations, as producing states have done. [read post]