Search for: "State v. Miner"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,376
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
The subject of Schepers’ letter was “Scientific Data on Fibrous Minerals and Beryllium. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
Int’l Minerals & Chem. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In Bliss v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
In Bonsmara Natural Beef Co., et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm
” In a chart entitled “Mineral Dusts,” the 1956 regulations specifically imposed a maximum exposure for free crystalline silica, depending upon the percentage concentration of silica in the total dust. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 10:07 am
In coming to its conclusion, the court distinguished a New York Bankruptcy case (Sabine Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
’ Primrose Operating Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
According to the Mineralogical Society of America’s Handbook of Mineralogy (and every other standard work on mineralogy I reviewed), anthophyllite and talc, whether in fibrous habit or not, are two different minerals, with very different chemical formulae, crystal chemistry, and structure.[20] Anthophyllite has the chemical formula: (Mg;Fe2+)2(Mg;Fe2+)5Si8O22(OH)2 and is an amphibole double chain silicate. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 11:36 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
Reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in United States Forest Service v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:57 am
V. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:03 am
In Piranha Partners et al v. [read post]
Bush v. Lone Oak Club – Texas Supreme Court Once Again Dives Into the Arcane Law of Water Boundaries
25 May 2020, 11:20 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 8:27 am
In State of Louisiana, et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:06 am
The question in Cannisnia Plantation, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:57 am
Furthermore, looking to the factors considered in Indigo Minerals, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are cumulative.Reputation of… [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
The SJC cited a United States Supreme Court case involving a state statute extinguishing mineral rights when not exercised for 20 years, Texaco, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 2:53 pm
Zinke (Mineral Leasing)Fercho v. [read post]
