Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 481 - 500 of 1,380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1]  The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1]  The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1]  The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1]  The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 6:43 pm by Patricia Salkin
AllEnergy Corporation and  AllEnergy Silica v Trempealeau County Environment and Land Use Committee, 2017 WL 2349200 (WI 5/31/2017)Filed under: Fracking, Special Use/Exception [read post]
25 May 2017, 10:23 am by Sarah M Donnelly
May 22, 2017): Doc. 23 – Unopposed Motion to Enter the Proposed Consent Decree and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion Doc. 26 – Order and Consent Decree Here are the documents in the related matter of United States v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:41 am by John McFarland
Last week the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in Lightning Oil Company v. [read post]