Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 41 - 60 of 1,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2017, 7:20 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
With less than two months before the May 31 deadline for public companies to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the inclusion of conflict minerals in their products, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a final judgment in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
As it “is impossible to transfer rights to an assignee under an expired mineral lease,” in a case where oil, gas and mineral leases had expired prior to plaintiff’s acquisition of the property, the Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeal in Litel Explorations, L.L.C. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 2:27 am by David Lynn
Court of Appeals decision came out earlier this week in National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:47 am by Steven Chadwick
On April 8, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of the State of Ohio issued its opinion in the matter of Walker v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:32 am by Broc Romanek
Also check out these industry-specific recaps of conflict mineral reporting from Deloitte… Debate: Safe Harbors v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 2:35 pm by John McFarland
Stated otherwise, until the Lyles seek to develop their minerals, Midway owes no duty to the Lyles respecting the surface usage. [read post]
The sharp decline in oil prices over the past year and a half has had a significant impact on operators and mineral lessees in Louisiana and in other oil-producing states. [read post]