Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 61 - 80 of 1,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1]  The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:48 am by Broc Romanek
The SEC is seeking a rehearing because the same court granted en banc rehearing in American Meat Institute v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 4:28 am by Joe Price
  Under century old Pennsylvania law known as the “Dunham Rule”,  the term “mineral” found in many old deeds does not include “natural gas” unless the deed states it is included. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:12 am by John McFarland
Last week the Texas Supreme Court granted petitions to hear appeals of two cases that could significantly affect the rights of Texas land and mineral owners: Atmos Energy Corp v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 10:02 am
Hegar stated, “We’re trying to raise a family and we can’t do it with a highway going through our property. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:09 am by Larry
The case is National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 9:46 am
From 1998 to 2004, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM or the Agency) conducted a large-scale land management planning process for federal fluid minerals development in Sierra and Otero Counties, where the Mesa is located. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:35 am by John McFarland
Veterans Land Bd. of State, 352 S.W.3d 479 (Tex. 2011), and KCM Financial LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Eventually, Coal Royalty and all the mineral rights’ lessees were realigned on one side as the plaintiffs in this case.Elements of State LawOhio’s Dormant Mineral Act, R.C. 5301.56, is part of the Marketable Title Act and creates a method to rejoin a surface property with abandoned mineral interests. [read post]