Search for: "State v. Miner"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:48 am
The SEC is seeking a rehearing because the same court granted en banc rehearing in American Meat Institute v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
The Louisiana Supreme Court’s reversal of Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 4:28 am
Under century old Pennsylvania law known as the “Dunham Rule”, the term “mineral” found in many old deeds does not include “natural gas” unless the deed states it is included. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
Last week the Texas Supreme Court granted petitions to hear appeals of two cases that could significantly affect the rights of Texas land and mineral owners: Atmos Energy Corp v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 4:50 am
In the case of Estate of Burns v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 10:02 am
Hegar stated, “We’re trying to raise a family and we can’t do it with a highway going through our property. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:09 am
The case is National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:03 pm
Last year, the Texas Court of Appeals in Waco decided the case of Merriman v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:29 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 8:22 am
On Friday, December 15, the Louisiana Supreme Court granted three separate writ applications filed by each of the defendants in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:35 am
Veterans Land Bd. of State, 352 S.W.3d 479 (Tex. 2011), and KCM Financial LLC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:01 pm
Block Mining, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:08 am
Was the Conflict Minerals Ruling a "Win" for SEC Rulemaking? [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:57 pm
But a two-judge majority upon panel rehearing in the conflict minerals case hewed closely to its earlier opinion, although it offered a second basis for its decision in order to account for the AMI case.As a result, the SEC’s rule and the Dodd-Frank Act provision are unconstitutional to the extent they require regulated entities to report to the Commission and to state on their website that any of their products have “not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:30 am
Like in NAM v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Circuit in American Meat Institute v. [read post]
