Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 81 - 100 of 1,387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2015, 3:57 pm by John Jascob
But a two-judge majority upon panel rehearing in the conflict minerals case hewed closely to its earlier opinion, although it offered a second basis for its decision in order to account for the AMI case.As a result, the SEC’s rule and the Dodd-Frank Act provision are unconstitutional to the extent they require regulated entities to report to the Commission and to state on their website that any of their products have “not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free. [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:28 am by Charles Sartain
It unambiguously stated that they were selling all of their mineral interests. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:26 pm by Harry Styron
The real estate contract stated clearly that the minerals were not to be conveyed. [read post]
The sharp decline in oil prices over the past year and a half has had a significant impact on operators and mineral lessees in Louisiana and in other oil-producing states. [read post]