Search for: "State v. Miner"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:08 am
Was the Conflict Minerals Ruling a "Win" for SEC Rulemaking? [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:30 am
Like in NAM v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:57 pm
But a two-judge majority upon panel rehearing in the conflict minerals case hewed closely to its earlier opinion, although it offered a second basis for its decision in order to account for the AMI case.As a result, the SEC’s rule and the Dodd-Frank Act provision are unconstitutional to the extent they require regulated entities to report to the Commission and to state on their website that any of their products have “not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Circuit in American Meat Institute v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
As it “is impossible to transfer rights to an assignee under an expired mineral lease,” in a case where oil, gas and mineral leases had expired prior to plaintiff’s acquisition of the property, the Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeal in Litel Explorations, L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 2:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:07 am
In Gladney v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:07 am
In Gladney v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:07 am
In Gladney v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:02 pm
In Thibodeaux v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
The case is State of Wyoming v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 5:53 am
State succession - a particularly thorny question undoubtedly belonging to the core of public international law - has so far not prompted much debate, but recent decisions in cases such as Sanum v Laos and World Wide Minerals v Kazakhstan is likely to change this. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:26 am
Last week the Texas Supreme Court handed down its decision in Ammonite v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:05 am
In its opinion in Cactus Water Services, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:28 am
It unambiguously stated that they were selling all of their mineral interests. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 5:43 am
” And Chesapeake v. [read post]
