Search for: "State v. Miner"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2021, 8:00 am
Stated otherwise, until the Lyles seek to develop their minerals, Midway owes no duty to the Lyles respecting the surface usage. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 12:39 pm
Mukasey, 534 F.3d at 188 (quoting Council of Alternative Political Parties v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:53 am
A pro-business entity -- the California Construction and Industrial Minerals Association -- sued, claiming that the ordinance was, among other things, inconsistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which, as you likely know, is a pro-environmental statute. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:47 am
In Williams v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
See Business Roundtable v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Here is the unpublished opinion. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:55 am
The United States Supreme Court recently issued an opinion that effects many Texas property and mineral owners. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
See Marin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:18 pm
The court was particularly persuaded of this considering how the Louisiana Supreme Court has defined the relationship between unit operators and unleased mineral owners, as well as considering the prior ruling in J&L Family, LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Nat’l Assoc. of Mfrs v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:46 am
El Dorado Chemical Company v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:06 am
The question in Cannisnia Plantation, LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:31 am
NationsBank and Judice v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
Reversing the Fourth Circuit, the Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in United States Forest Service v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 8:25 am
Dec. 8, 2006) (Miner, Pooler, Katzmann) (per curiam): In United States v. [read post]
