Search for: "State v. Miner"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2022, 11:55 am
He has represented the mining, construction and building materials industries on mineral extraction and land development projects for more than 25 years. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 6:23 pm
Also cited in the footnote is the recent Supreme Court opinion in Protech Minerals Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm
After reviewing other authority, the Corpus Christi court concluded that, contrary to Mapco, “the well-recognized, decisional law states that the mineral estate owner owns the minerals but not the subsurface. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:53 am
This week it is Northwest Landowners Association v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm
United States (Trust Relationship; Mineral Leasing) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Ahtna, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 1:28 pm
The court’s full ruling in State of Louisiana et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:40 pm
Apache Stronghold v USA, 38 F. 4th 742 (6/242/2022) [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
President Biden will soon sign into law the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which provides $750 billion in funding and major federal policy changes impacting the U.S. energy, environment, healthcare and tax sectors. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 4:13 am
Withrow v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 12:06 pm
State of North Dakota, 2022 ND 150. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:00 am
The case is Minister of Health and Another v Alliance of Natural Health Products (South Africa) [2022] ZASCA 49 (11 April 2022) [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:55 am
It was specifically stated: the parties ” … intended that all minerals owned by the Holcomb’s were to be reserved …” to the Holcomb’s and “some question has arisen regarding whether the language of the mineral reservation accomplishes this intention. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
They did not allow land to remain in its natural state, but over generations both developed it for a variety of commercial purposes and exploited it for mineral resources. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:38 am
Co-author Carolina Cuppitelli* The question presented in Aaron v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:50 am
In Justice Samuel Alito's (SA's) opinion for the Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm
The Justices of that Court, however, would probably be the first to disclaim any credibility on the causes of any disease.[3] The authors further distort the notion of signature diseases by stating that “[v]aginal adenocarcinoma in young women appears to be a signature disease associated with maternal use of DES. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm
Dissent: The plaintiffs' claims are barred by Heck v. [read post]
