Search for: "State v. Monk" Results 1 - 20 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm by Giles Peaker
On A1 P1, though, Mr S ran into the problem that his tenancy agreement stated "100. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:01 am by Dominic Pugh
In order to ascertain whether the works constituted “works of repair”, it was necessary to compare the property in its actual state with its previous state (Quick v Taff Ely Borough Council [1985] EWCA Civ 1). [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:31 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2015] EWCA Civ 78 The appeal considered, where a commercial property has been stripped out for renovation, what physical state it is considered to be in for the purpose of liability for rates. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm by NL
The Court of Appeal was bound by the House of Lords decision in Hammersmith v Monk. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm by NL
The Court of Appeal was bound by the House of Lords decision in Hammersmith v Monk. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by tracey
Supreme Court Newbigin (Valuation Officer) v SJ & J Monk (a firm) [2017] UKSC 14 (1 March 2017) EV (A Child), Re (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 15 (1 March 2017) AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier & Ors [2017] UKSC 13 (1 March 2017) IPCO (Nigeria) Ltd v Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation [2017] UKSC 16 (1 March 2017) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Casson v Hudson & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 125 (03 March 2017) Tchenguiz & Ors v Kaupthing Bank… [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am by Andrew Hamm
United States (Fourth Amendment, electronic privacy), and City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 3:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal brought by the appellant challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision to follow Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk [1992] AC 478, which states that a notice to quit given by one of a number of joint periodic tenants is effective to terminate the tenancy. [read post]
The disputed rates in Newbigin (Valuation Officer) (Respondent) v S J & J Monk (a firm) (Appellant) relate to building works in 2012 and the question was whether the rating list could give the building a £1 nominal value or whether it had to assume a market value based in an assumption of repair. [read post]