Search for: "State v. Monk" Results 21 - 40 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
(Editor’s Note: This essay was written by Robert Monks and Harvard Law School Visiting Professor Peter Murray.) [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Sims v Dacorum Borough Council the Court unanimously dismissed the appeal challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision to follow Hammersmith and Fulham LBC V Monk [1992] AC 478. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:43 am by SHG
Marshall’s most famous decision — Marbury v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am by Francis Davey
As those familiar with Hammersmith and Fulham v Monk will recall, a periodic tenancy is a so-called “springing interest”. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:05 am
The purpose of the meeting was to hear the renunciation or reaffirmation by the monk Martin Luther of dissident views. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:34 am by pgbarnes
  The law  is being challenged by 26 states and the National Federation of Independent Business. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Some interesting items have crossed my desk on Friday and Saturday: From the Grand Theft: Property blog, Jim Mattson posts his thoughts about Monks v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am by Dave
The other repeat player is the subject-matter of the application: is the rule in Hammersmith & Fulham LBC v Monk, about which we have written much in the past year or so, compatible with Article 8? [read post]