Search for: "State v. Monks"
Results 1 - 20
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 8:24 am
Scott v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:34 am
Knapton v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 5:42 pm
Supreme Court denied review in Castille v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Have no fear, though; previously, in Lake v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:01 am
In order to ascertain whether the works constituted “works of repair”, it was necessary to compare the property in its actual state with its previous state (Quick v Taff Ely Borough Council [1985] EWCA Civ 1). [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:25 am
Joseph Abbey v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:31 am
On appeal from: [2015] EWCA Civ 78 The appeal considered, where a commercial property has been stripped out for renovation, what physical state it is considered to be in for the purpose of liability for rates. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
The Court of Appeal was bound by the House of Lords decision in Hammersmith v Monk. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:10 pm
Wade), 539 (Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:42 pm
Monks et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
United States (Fourth Amendment, electronic privacy), and City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 3:31 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal brought by the appellant challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision to follow Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk [1992] AC 478, which states that a notice to quit given by one of a number of joint periodic tenants is effective to terminate the tenancy. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:02 pm
The recent case of Monks v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 8:20 pm
The complaint (full text) in Burma Task Force v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:37 am
The disputed rates in Newbigin (Valuation Officer) (Respondent) v S J & J Monk (a firm) (Appellant) relate to building works in 2012 and the question was whether the rating list could give the building a £1 nominal value or whether it had to assume a market value based in an assumption of repair. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:20 pm
Waldrip v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 11:20 am
Mekonen v LB Waltham Forest, County Court at Central London, 8 August 2022 Ms Mekonen was a refugee from Ethiopia with limited ability to speak or read English. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:15 pm
The first, Golden State Water Company v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
Hoyle v. [read post]
