Search for: "State v. Monroe" Results 61 - 80 of 659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Reassignment of unit work to nonunit employees an improper practice under the Taylor LawMonroe County v New York State Pub. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:26 am
The other jurisdiction was Canada, and the Court gave recognition to the marriage under the State's longstanding "marriage recognition rule"  - Martinez v County of Monroe, 2008 NY Slip Op 00909. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Claiming absolute privilege or qualified privilege as a defense in litigation involving alleged defamatory statementsSpring v County of Monroe, 2019 NY Slip Op 00747, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe relevant facts in this action were not in dispute. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Claiming absolute privilege or qualified privilege as a defense in litigation involving alleged defamatory statementsSpring v County of Monroe, 2019 NY Slip Op 00747, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe relevant facts in this action were not in dispute. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In addition, noted the court, arbitration is not barred by res judicata inasmuch as there is no identity of parties or issues.* Crespo v County of Monroe, New York, 2015 WL 2406112 [WD NY] The Appellate Division noted that there has been no final determination in this federal action.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_07381.htm [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:02 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Cases from the District of Columbia and four states — South Carolina, Virginia, Delaware and Kansas — were consolidated into Brown v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
The “Twitter Libel” case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins continued to take the media law headlines this week. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:15 am by Josh H. Escovedo
In issuing its ruling and permitting AVELA’s attempt to cancel the MARILYN MONROE trademark on the ground that it is generic, Judge Failla stated “To be clear, the court harbors serious doubts that V. [read post]