Search for: "State v. Montgomery" Results 1 - 20 of 1,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2010, 2:44 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0568, DA 09-0574, 2010 MT 193, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 8:13 am by scanner1
CIVIL – POSTCONVICTION DA 16-0021, 2016 MT 169, MATTHEW MONTGOMERY, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
Nadine Montgomery (“NM”) brought a claim against Lanarkshire Health Board arguing that the delivery of her baby Sam Montgomery (“Sam”) fell below the standard to be expected of a reasonably competent obstetrician. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:25 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Merger of robbery and obtaining property In 2011, a jury in the Circuit Court for Washington County convicted Bashawn Moneak Montgomery, appellant, of one count of robbery, one count of second-degree assault, two counts of theft, two counts of obtaining property by use of a stolen credit card, and ... [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 12:07 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Plea agreement In 2012, pursuant to a 31-count indictment filed in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Trevon Marquise Montgomery, appellant, was charged with first-degree murder, attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon, use of a handgun in the commission of a felony or crime of violence, and related ... [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:54 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Compact disc This case turns on whether, and for how long, David James Montgomery retained a legitimate expectation of privacy in a compact disc (“CD”) that he left in a laptop he pawned and failed to redeem. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:00 pm by Andrew M. Ironside
The title of this post comes from this essay by Professor Douglas Berman, the abstract of which states: Montgomery v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:51 am
The Court reasoned that a less restrictive, effective means of combating fraud would be to make fraud illegal, and Montgomery County and the state of Maryland already have such laws.The full opinion is available in pdf. [read post]