Search for: "State v. Moon" Results 1 - 20 of 572
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2024, The Rt Hon Lucy Frazer MP, the Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport, and The Rt Hon James Cleverly MP, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, published their decision to vary a Restriction Order from the Leveson Inquiry to allow the use of the ledger cards for the purpose of the ongoing misuse of private information claim brought by seven claimants against Associated Newspapers. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of Canada recently decided in Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
New on the Short Circuit podcast: A pair of motions to suppress that shoot the moon. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
" Excerpt:The "free lunch" refers to the once-common tradition of saloons in the United States providing a "free" lunch to patrons who had purchased at least one drink. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct)  lcb11@psu.edu     Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 7:04 am by Just Security
Financial System Contributed to Afghanistan’s Collapse by Timor Sharan (@TimorSharan) BRICS Summit BRICS Summitry: What Takeaways for the United States? [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm by Orin S. Kerr
All of this is a wind-up to say that, last week, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled on both questions in considerable detail in an important new case, State v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]