Search for: "State v. Moye" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” The court then went on to state that “[e]ven if Moyes . . . survived Edwards, we find Moyes factually distinguishable from our case. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:09 pm
Two civil court judges in the Lone Star State got physical in their benchslapping yesterday, reports the Dallas Morning News Crime Blog: It was a reported shoving match between Judge Carlos Cortez of the 44th Civil District Court and Judge Eric V. [read post]
In its discussion of Moyes, the Court challenged the Moyes court’s “reasonableness” or “slight affect” approach to employee non-solicitation provisions and contrasted it with the plain language of section 16600 and the California Supreme Court’s decision in Edwards v. [read post]
In its discussion of Moyes, the Court challenged the Moyes court’s “reasonableness” and slight affect approach to employee non-solicitation provisions and contrasted it with the plain language of 16600 and subsequent case law in the California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:43 am
  The decision from two weeks ago—a Friday—in LaBarre v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:10 pm
Rick Wilson, drafter of the EU amicus brief in Roper v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:48 am
Moyes (1985) case which held that employee non-solicits are enforceable in California. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:44 pm by Steve Hall
  The 1986 Supreme Court ruling in Ford v. [read post]