Search for: "State v. Murray" Results 61 - 80 of 1,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2023, 1:04 pm by Amy Howe
The justices return to the bench and to statutory interpretation on Oct. 10 in Murray v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:56 am by Unknown
As amicus in support of the petitioner, the U.S. government has asked to participate in oral argument, using part of the petitioner’s allotted time (Murray v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The investigating body sent a confidential Letter of Request to a foreign state seeking information and documents relating to him. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:05 pm
In this Commentary, I show how the tradition-entrenching methods the Court employed to decide New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:05 pm by Christine Corcos
In this Commentary, I show how the tradition-entrenching methods the Court employed to decide New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Harris v McRae held that a ‘negative’ right to abortion required no positive state funding, upholding the Hyde Amendment that excluded funding coverage for medically necessary abortions from an otherwise comprehensive Medicaid program. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
I know that much time went into this release, including many hours over at least one very taxing weekend put in by Melissa Roverts Harke, Robert Holowka, Sirimal Mukerjee, Adele Kittredge Murray, Neema Nassiri-Motlagh, Jill Pritzker, David Stevens, Thomas Strumpf, Sarah ten Siethoff, and Samuel K. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
NRDC. ] The Supreme Court granted certiorari in two cases today, Murray v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:19 am by Christine Corcos
  In this Commentary, I show how the tradition-entrenching methods the Court employed to decide New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]