Search for: "State v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2013, 9:03 am
Federal Law Preserves State Negligence Claims Ultimately, in Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 9:04 am by Steven Cohen
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY – United States District Court – Middle District of Georgia – July 6th, 2018) started after the plaintiff attempted to sit on a chair that then fell apart in the computer room at the defendant’s train depot. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 9:04 am by Steven Cohen
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY – United States District Court – Middle District of Georgia – July 6th, 2018) started after the plaintiff attempted to sit on a chair that then fell apart in the computer room at the defendant’s train depot. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:17 am by Carolyn E. Riggs
SC95514, the Missouri Supreme Court held that Missouri courts lack the requisite personal jurisdiction, either specific or general, over a non-resident defendant, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, in a claim brought by a non-resident plaintiff who asserted a Federal Employer’s Liability Act (FELA) violation arising from his employment by Norfolk Southern in the State of Indiana. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:46 am by Steven Boutwell
  Russel Parker, plaintiff, was an Indiana resident who was allegedly injured in Indiana while employed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company (“Norfolk”), a Virginia corporation with its principal place of business in Virginia. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:47 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, a case from the Norfolk Division of the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:22 pm by MBettman
The project was beset with delays from the beginning, including problems for Boone Coleman with subcontractors and problems for Piketon in obtaining easements from adjoining property owners and issues contracting with Norfolk Southern Railway Company (N&S) to synchronize the new traffic signal with a railway crossing near the intersection. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:24 am by Anna Christensen
The Court called for the views of the Acting Solicitor General this morning in the following cases: Title: Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:38 am by MBettman
(See helpful photo on p. 2 of Rails-to-Trails’ Brief) In 2009, the non-profit organization, Rails-to-Trails of Wayne County (“Rails-to-Trails”), bought the Disputed Property from its predecessor in interest, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, successor by merger to Conrail Corporation (“the Railroad”), with the intent of converting it into a public trail. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:37 am by Lyle Denniston
The case of Norfolk Southern Railway v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 11:49 am by MBettman
In 2009, the non-profit organization, Rails-to-Trails of Wayne County (“Rails-to-Trails”), bought the Disputed Property from its predecessor in interest, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, successor by merger to Conrail Corporation (“the Railroad”), with the intent of converting it into a public trail. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 8:36 am by Spencer King
Gulf Oil Corp. to determine whether a contract is maritime or non-martime, and adopted a simplified two-part analysis, based on the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am by Christa Culver
These are petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues Title: Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am by Erin Miller
The opinion below, from the Court of Appeals of Minnesota, is unpublished Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. [read post]