Search for: "State v. National Advertising Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Mead Johnson & Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:18 am
" Relying heavily on the precedent of State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 6:07 pm
Rocky Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 1:16 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:16 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:52 am
In Penzer v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
(See State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Co. (7th Cir. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:47 am
National Union Fire Insurance Co., 2010 WL 3928704 (D. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
AT&T Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 325, 332; see State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:13 am
Here, the court correctly concludes that AdWords advertising is equivalent to running a print ad in a national magazine. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 8:34 am
Invista S.A.R.L. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:53 am
Seventh Circuit Decertifies Multi-State Class Action Alleging Consumer Protection Act Violations – In an opinion sure to raise the ire of class counsel around the nation, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decertified a multi-state class action against Sears, Roebuck & Co. alleging false advertising under various state consumer protection statutes and individual claims for violations of Tennessee’s Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:15 am
This ruling is hardly a surprise and is consistent with the Court’s recent decisions in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 1:00 pm
., P.C. v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm
”And in any event, the suggestion that the First Amendment problem dissolves because regulated individuals remain free to speak themselves is in deep tension with the reasoning of other precedents of the Court.For example, in 1974 in Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm
In late 2010, the Tribunal imposed AMPs of $20,000 and $10,000 against parties in Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. [read post]
