Search for: "State v. Neale" Results 1 - 20 of 799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2010, 2:15 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s a link to the petitioner’s reply to the SG’s opposition to the cert petition in Neal v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 12:09 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Start date On March 10, 2009, pursuant to a binding guilty plea agreement, appellant, Boisey Neal, pleaded guilty, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, to three counts of robbery with a deadly or dangerous weapon, and one count of use of a handgun in the commission of a ... [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 7:46 am by Daily Record Staff
Administrative law — Conditional release from DHMH — Substantial evidence Appellant, Neal Manning, applied for conditional release from the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene under Section 114(c) of the Criminal Procedure Article of the Maryland Code. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s a link to the SG’s opposition to the cert petition in Neal v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 8:29 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Split sentence Appellant, Troy Neal Edwards, appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence by the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:45 pm by Dwight Sullivan
We previously noted the cert petition in Neal v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:49 am by Dwight Sullivan
As indicated here, yesterday the Supreme Court asked the Solicitor General to respond to the cert petition in Neal v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 5:47 am
Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006), and his representation of the State of Louisiana when it sought rehearing in Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:52 am by Daily Record Staff
Neal’s cell mate, Appellant Treyvon Miller, was convicted of first-degree assault, second-degree assault, and reckless endangerment for allegedly participating in the attack. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:33 pm by Dwight Sullivan
NEAL, 68 M.J. 289 (C.A.A.F. 2010), AND UNITED STATES v. [read post]