Search for: "State v. Nelson" Results 161 - 180 of 2,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Nelson and VanDyke, filed an opinion dissenting from the denial of en banc review, saying in pat:Our decision in Pickup [v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain's opinion respecting rehearing en banc released today (and joined by Judges Sandra Ikuta, Ryan Nelson, and Lawrence VanDyke) in Tingley v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The last half century has witnessed extraordinary, almost unimaginable, changes in how Americans think about the death penalty.Fifty years ago, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court brought a temporary halt to capital punishment in Furman v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am by Unknown
Nelson, J.D.The Senate Appropriations Committee and the House Appropriations Committee released the text of the long-awaited FY23 omnibus government funding bill late Monday night. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 3:57 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Nelson & Others v The City Council of Bluff, Iowa: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, case number 21-3794 (10 November 2022) [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:33 am by Earl Drott
Certain seemingly innocuous factual scenarios can present challenges in demonstrating fault, though, as shown in Max Nelson and Carolyn Nelson, as Co-Guardians of Matthew Nelson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The bill would introduce new powers to deal with serious disruption caused by protesters, including allowing the Secretary of State to bring civil proceedings against campaigners. [read post]