Search for: "State v. Nettles" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2022, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
In doing so, Scoffield J relied on Order 1, rule 1A(3) of the Rules of the Court of Judicature (Northern Ireland) 1980 (as amended), in support of ‘grasping the nettle’ where a ‘claim rests on an unsustainable foundation. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
Today's denial shows that the Court is none too eager to grasp the nettle of crafting judicial limits on Kelo takings. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am by Rosalind English
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts: British Columbia Supreme Court grasps the nettle in right to die case Toppled, choked, locked-in: where are human rights when you need them? [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:58 am by Lyle Denniston
  And they clearly nettled the author of the majority’s ruling, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
United States A Judge has ruled that three major defamation lawsuits from Dominion Voting Systems against MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell and the right-wing lawyers Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani will move forward toward a trial. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
Globalization has opened holes in the walls that used to serve to police and protect states and their power authority. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Surprisingly this nettle has only really been grasped once before, by the House of Lords seven years ago in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, where the question whether the abuse of process in getting the defendant deported from Zimbabwe to trial in the UK rendered his conviction so unsafe as to qualify him for compensation for miscarriage of justice. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by Cyberleagle
It is open to question whether compliance with the legality principle can be achieved simply by inserting ‘proportionate’ into a broadly stated legal duty, instead of grasping the nettle of articulating a more concrete obligation that would enable the proportionality of the interference with fundamental rights to be assessed by a court. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am by Rosalind English
The court rejected the “bold” submission, stating that there was no precedent anywhere in the world and such socially controversial changes were only for Parliament. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by admin
They are primarily operated and developed on a state-by-state bar association basis. [read post]