Search for: "State v. Nine" Results 1 - 20 of 7,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2009, 2:43 am
Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families Fletcher v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 1355; [2009] WLR (D) 36 "The rule embodied in the staff regulations made by the board of governors of the European Schools, limiting to nine years the period of employment of teachers seconded by the Department of Children, [...] [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:46 am
FH (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A delay of two years and nine months in dealing with an application for indefinite leave to remain constituted culpable and undue delay on the part of the Secretary of State for the Home Department and was productive of conspicuous unfairness in the case [...] [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:34 am by Kate Fort
Question Presented: Absent express federal authorization, the State of California lacks jurisdiction to regulate the licensing of contractors on the tribal trust land of the Twenty- Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:20 pm
Wells (08A407) and Wrotnowski v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:39 am by sally
Duncombe and Others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families Court of Appeal “Staff regulations restricting to nine years the period of employing teachers seconded by the Department of Children, Schools and Families to work in the European Schools, which provided education to the children of bureaucrats of the European Union, were unlawful. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 6:23 am
Among the nine majority opinions (which is more than I've seen in a while - and right before Christmas, too) is State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:33 am by CivPro Blogger
Greene (09-1454) involved a section 1983 action for damages based on alleged violations of the Fourth Amendment in the interview of a nine-year-old elementary-school student by state officials without a warrant or... [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 7:40 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Discovery violation by state — Brady A jury in the Circuit Court for Charles County convicted Miguel Santana of one count of first-degree murder; four counts of attempted first-degree murder; five counts of use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence; nine counts of reckless endangerment; and one ... [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]