Search for: "State v. Noll" Results 41 - 60 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 11:03 am by Kent Scheidegger
From the Interesting Stuff Stumbled Upon While Looking For Something Else File comes United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 11:56 am by Schachtman
(Feb. 5, 2015) (noting that Rosner testified for plaintiffs); Noll v American Biltrite, Inc., 188 Wash. [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In the end, he brought a malicious prosecution case against the police, but it gets dismissed on what we might call a technicality.The case is Spak v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm by Stephen Page
  His Honour stated:            “At first glance, it therefore appears [under s106B(2) and s80(1)] that the Court could very well have the power to make the order charging the husband’s mother’s property if the Court is satisfied after a trial of the orders sought pursuant to s106B should be made and that the husband’s mother should be ordered to repay the money directly to the wife rather than the husband,… [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
(Pl.'s SUMF ¶ 58) On April 7, 2015, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Frank Miller dismissed the case against Plaintiff by nolle prosequi. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
On May 24, 2010, the petitioner was sentenced to twenty-seven months incarceration on each count, to run concurrently, for a total effective sentence of twenty-seven months imprisonment.The state nolled the remaining charges against the petitioner in both this case and the Stamford case.The petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in August, 2010. . . . [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 8:53 am by INFORRM
On the day of the plaintiff’s criminal trial, Socha failed to come to court, and the State entered a nolle prosequi. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 6:39 am
On the day of the plaintiff's criminal trial, Socha failed to come to court, and the State entered a nolle prosequi.McCarthy v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm by David Russcol
The second change, in 2014, came in the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]