Search for: "State v. Nordstrom"
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2017, 6:54 am
Nordstrom, a summary order decided on March 29. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Sponsored Topics: United States Attorney - Law - Los Angeles - United States - US Attorney [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:42 am
Internet companies should not be able to override state law by contract when there’s a significant state policy interest in protecting state residents. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 7:26 am
Several pre-selected opinions (Loving v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:16 pm
Brown v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 10:11 am
Fiesta also named several clothing retailers such as Nordstrom and Amazon as defendants in its lawsuit. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:14 am
About twenty years after Wilson, the court in State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 10:05 pm
newsitemid=25441&topic=sibos … Keyloggers found on 10 Nordstrom registers in Florida – Ten registers in Nordstrom stores in Aventura Florida repo… http://ow.ly/2BwklW Employee Termination Based on Mistaken Belief of Facebook Post Authorship Upheld Smizer v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:01 am
Nordstrom, Inc., 90 USPQ2d 1758 (TTAB 2008). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:07 am
See Nordstrom, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
See Oachs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG) Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46) Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich (Intellectual… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]
